Validation beta. Planned product capabilities are shown transparently; no payment is taken today.
Use case

Measure the ROI of your multi-AI subscription stack.

A practical framework for builders paying for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and local AI at the same time.

The operating problem

Why this matters

Paying for several AI tools is easy. Knowing whether each subscription creates enough value to justify its cost is harder. The problem gets worse when quota limits, duplicate capabilities and manual switching hide where the work actually gets done.

Operating pattern

A smaller, measurable control loop.

1. Classify

Understand task risk, privacy, quality needs and the available AI stack before choosing a model.

2. Route

Apply explicit policy instead of defaulting every task to the most expensive or most familiar tool.

3. Measure

Track useful outcomes, spend and exceptions so the routing policy improves from evidence.

  • Inventory fixed subscription cost before buying more API usage.
  • Route work by capability, privacy, quota and marginal cost.
  • Record which model completed the task—not just which model was opened.
  • Compare monthly AI spend with avoided API cost, time saved and useful outcomes.

Is this problem worth solving for you?

Register your stack, biggest pain and reasonable price. That evidence determines what we build next.

Register qualified interest